You have guest access to browse, login, or register.

 On the Table
REGISTER TODAY for CSW Expo 2024 as we celebrate the hobby together!
Read Today's News | Watch Today's Videos | CSW Brief #7
160 News Items for April [updated 22 Apr.]
I want to: [Join | Subscribe to Forum] | [Receive News | Submit News] | Buy/Sell | Donate | Report Problem Post]
XML RSS feed

Go to:

 [F] CSW Forum  / Boardgaming  / On the Table

This is the place to talk about the game you are currently playing and why -- is it the topic matter, were you inspired by a book, because of a friend´s recommendation, because of the publisher or the designer? We invite everyone to post here your current gaming activities, so members can get a quick sense of what is presently hitting the table tops. Be sure to also take advantage of any topics dedicated to the game you are playing as well for more in-depth discussion. This topic is now spotlighted at our news site, so please post on-topic!

Please be courteous and do not repost pictures posted here without first obtaining permission

Your moderator - Allan Rothberg

Attachment:

Leviathans.jpg



Older Items Oldest Items Outline (older msg: 78309)

J. R. Tracy - Sep 20, 2016 7:38 am (#78310 Total: 91497)  

 
[Tracy, J. R.]
We had thirteen players for playtesting, real-time ASW action, and a little something from Dan VIII's collection of odds and ends.

Bill, Smitch, Jim, Manfred, Mitch, Dan VIII, and Tenno opted for real-time Captain Sonar. With the odd number, one team was short-handed, so celebrated radio operator Mitchell "Sparks" Stein joined Dan and Tenno on the three-man crew. Both teams neglected to name their subs, a grievous oversight that has been forwarded to the Discipline Committee for review.


Checking the plot

As expected, this was a very different experience from last week's turn-based game. They surfaced much more often to clear damage, relying on the cover of chaos to protect them. It was interesting to see how differently the two teams operated. At one point the big team seemed almost dead in the water while the other crew banged out move after move. The small crew ultimately triumphed - I don't know if was due to better efficiency, an inherent advantage of a small team, or pure dumb luck. Fun session for all, though.

The same group followed up with Secret Hitler. I don't know how all the roles split, but Bill-as-Hitler was elected to office with the help of Chancellor Jim.


Co-conspirators

Nate sat down to teach Dave Android: Netrunner. Dave took the corporate side, using Jinteki for all seven games. Natus ran with Shaper for the first five, before switching to Anarch. Dave learned quite a bit, taking two games, and expanded our pool of potential NR players.


Anarchvillain

Meanwhile, Hawkeye introduced Rich to Up Front, with the traditional Meeting of Patrols. Hawkeye took the dogfaces against Rich's squareheads. Rich picked up on the key tactics early, as Hawkeye seemed to be perpetually under wire. They went the distance, ending in a draw after a very cagey match. Rich is sold on the game and looking for more.


Another convert

Scott and I opened with a playtest of Charles Vasey's B1704, applying the W1815 system to the Battle of Blenheim. The Duke of Marlborough leads an Anglo-Allied army against the Franco-Bavarian force of the Duc de Tallard. The French and Bavarians await the Allied attack behind the the Nebel (a marsh-bound stream), relying on fortified hamlets and counterpunching cavalry to withstand the assault.


Tallard's batteries speak

For those unfamiliar with W1815, each side is represented by a number of formation cards, each with its own CRT. Combat results are casualties, morale hits, or both, affecting either (and occasionally both) sides depending on the roll. The map is a schematic of the battlefield, and serves to hold the division blocks that represent the manpower of a given formation. Commanders typically have one-use special powers. Victory is attained by driving the enemy's casualty track to zero, or by breaking their morale. Morale hits reduce army morale, and casualties trigger morale checks.

Historically Marlborough demonstrated against the flanks to deny support to the French center, before launching his own assault against the heart of Tallard's line. In game terms, Colonel Cutts leads his brigade against Blenheim on the Allied left, with the possibility of 'locking' French reserves into the fight for the town. Eugene, facing Marsin and the town of Lutzingen on the right, doesn't have such a direct effect. However, if his units aren't activated at least once every three turns, Marsin can release troops to help Tallard in the center.


The Nebel ran red

Eugene and Marlborough each have an infantry and cavalry card, but must first deploy pontoons before engaging the French/Bavarian line. In the meantime, the French heavy batteries pound Allied morale as they slog across the swampy approach. Once the pontoons are down, the French batteries are overrun and Marlborough and Eugene assault Oberglau and Lutzingen respectively. When a town is taken, the relevant formation cards are flipped with the Allies becoming more effective and the French/Bavarians less so. At this point the Franco-Bavarians are usually on the ropes, but Allied morale may be wavering; can Marlborough finish off Tallard before his army loses the will to continue?

We played four games, switching sides. In our opener, Cutts failed spectacularly before Blenheim but Eugene blasted his way into Lutzingen on his first attempt and never looked back. In the second, Marlborough grabbed Oberglau and settled into a long attritional battle with the French failing morale first. In the third, Clérambault got a division over to Tallard, allowing him to last long enough to destroy the Duke's foot. The Elector of Bavaria was flattened and both sides were reeling but the Duke's cavalry carried the day, forcing the clinching rout test. The last was our sole French win - Cutts seduced both French reserve divisions into Blenheim, but the French batteries scored two morale hits in the meantime. Casualties were surprisingly light but the Allied morale steadily sank until they finally failed a test two boxes short of routing outright.


Marsin wears thin

I enjoyed B1704, and feel it reflects Blenheim to the extent possible in such a small package. We had one blowout but the other three were quite close games. The onus is on the Allies to dictate the flow, but Tallard has choices with respect to reserves and the timing of counterattacks. The typical +1 die roll bonus for a counterattack is always tempting, but the eligible formation may be just one casualty away from elimination, which might stay your hand. I like the tension once Marlborough is across the Nebel - the Gens d'Armes charge home again and again, hoping to force a fatal rout test before Tallard is swept away. A fun and satisfying little game, worthy of its ancestor.


The Allies lose their mojo

We followed up with the short Kashmir scenario from Next War: India-Pakistan, using the basic rules. Scott was Pakistan, trying to wrest Kashmir away from my Indians, aided by Chinese airmobile forces. The system is a highly polished expression of classic wargaming ideas - sticky (but not locking) zones of control, odds based combat, troop quality, reserve and exploitation movement, and so on. The sequence of play varies depending on initiative - if one side has the upper hand, the pace really picks up, with a given unit potentially moving and fighting three times in a single turn.

Unit class is very important in the Next War system, interacting with terrain for both movement and combat. Perched on the western slopes of the Himalayas, the scenario's battle area has a broad range of terrain, mostly suited to mountain troops and light infantry. There are a couple valleys in which armor can can get its war on, including the Vale of Kashmir. Air support in the basic game is straightforward, with attack helicopters and fast movers providing die roll modifiers, though only after surviving anti-air defenses. Both sides have airmobile infantry, very useful but again subject to anti-air.


On top of the world

In this scenario both sides collect VPs for eliminating enemy units, but the bulk of the scoring is for terrain objectives - five hexes worth five VPs each to whoever holds them at the end of the four turn game. My troops started near the borders, with three of the five rear-area objectives unprotected. Scott opened by attempting a coup de main against vacant Anantnag with a pair of PRC airmobile brigades. He had an 80% chance of success, but my ever-vigilant air defense forces sent the Chinese packing. The rest of his forces rolled up to my border outposts and proceeded to bash their way into the disputed province.

I garrisoned all the objectives at my first opportunity, and moved to reinforce the borders. I relied on my frontier outposts to slow the assault on Baramula, leaving my best unit to defend the city itself, protected by high mountains and a stream. In the north, Scott pieced together a large multi-hex attack against the mountain division facing Taobat, inflicting casualties but failing to dislodge the defenders. I reinforced, and a second attack saw a similar result. He abandoned that front and threw everything into the Baramula operation.


The Chinese lend a hand

The Baramula fight was a grind, as I traded bodies for time. Scott had the initiative for the first two turns, but it shifted over to me at the end. He needed to crack my line quickly, and called for a Chinese air assault to cut my retreat paths. The Hips got through this time, but my mountain troops held on. With just one turn to go and initiative flipping to me, we saw no chance for a breakthrough and called it.

This is a tidy little scenario, limited in options as you'd expect for its size, but well suited to teaching the system. I liked the dynamic turn sequence and the unit class distinctions. The use of supporting assets is clean but the air defense component feels a little elaborate. Still, it's quite a jump to the involved air and detection systems of the advanced game. We'll save those for another day, but I think the appeal is strong and we will return to this. All three titles hold interest but I reckon we'll stick with India-Pakistan for the time being.


Noted authority on mountain warfare

Dan VIII reached into his bag of tricks for a suitable nightcap and emerged with Junk Art. This is a dexterity/stacking game similar to Bausack/Sac Noir. The basic stacking game is shaped by card play; City cards set the victory conditions for the current game, and Junk Art cards determine what kind of pieces you place next. Depending on the city, you might need the tallest structure, the most pieces, or simply be the last player standing. Tenno proved to have the steadiest hand, graciously accepting the Junk Art crown to close out the evening.


Towering achievements

Jason Pipes - Sep 20, 2016 8:06 am (#78311 Total: 91497)  

[Pipes, Jason]
Fantastic details regarding B1704. Thanks for sharing! Any idea who will be publishing this one?

Vince Hughes - Sep 20, 2016 8:12 am (#78312 Total: 91497)  

 
[Hughes, Vince]
CVG

Crazy-Vasey Games

Jason Pipes - Sep 20, 2016 8:33 am (#78313 Total: 91497)  

[Pipes, Jason]
Excellent, thanks!

Martin Sample - Sep 20, 2016 8:35 am (#78314 Total: 91497)  

 
[Sample, Martin]
But if you compare ownership stats with a game of a comparable 'audience' (in an attempt to get approximately the same ratio of 'real owners' to 'BGG owners'), such as Washington's War: there are 2.9K owners of Sekigahara on BGG and 3.4K owners of WW on BGG. Since GMT says they've sold 9K copies of WW, assuming a similar ratio for Sekigahara gives about 7.7K copies.


Split across three print runs, that means an average of around 2400 units. Even if a New Guinea game only did one print run that size, that's still commercially viable. I also can't remember if GMT "took a flyer" on it and set the print run in motion before it hit 500 - it languished on the list for quite some time. So did Dominant Species and I think even Twilight Struggle.

Scott Muldoon - Sep 20, 2016 8:57 am (#78315 Total: 91497)  

 
[Muldoon, Scott]
Twilight Struggle took only five months to make 500 (June 14 to November 9, 2004 according to posts here at CSW). Perhaps that was long for the time, I seem to remember it "languishing".

Scott Muldoon - Sep 20, 2016 9:00 am (#78316 Total: 91497)  

 
[Muldoon, Scott]
Sekigahara, on the other hand, took over two years (Nov 2006 to Jan 2009) and then two more years until actual publication.

John Vasilakos - Sep 20, 2016 9:19 am (#78317 Total: 91497)  

 
[Vasilakos, John]
Gazala 42 (Avalanche)

Inspired by recent readings, I set this up again solo...

And it was meh....Played only the opening rounds scenario, and the game felt mostly like a dice rolling exercise. Rolling for German activation and rolling for minefield clearing. The dice were not favorable to Jerry this time and they lost

Why did I feel this way, I think it was because the British are way underrated, the had about twice as many tanks (and some of those were Grants) than the Germans for example. Yet the game gives them only a slim margin in Armour values. As a result, the success of German versus the British Armor Divisions are hardly in doubt.

Now the historian will say that reflects what happened, true, but it happened because of better German tactics and abysmal British tactics (including the British favorite tactic of sending in Armour piecemeal and unsupported, very sporting of them don't you think?)

By making the British too weak, the game thus takes away any tension, any challenge and any hope for the British to change history. Now the game has an activation system that does a good job of messing with the British, so I could see another approach in which the British Values were given their historical paper strengths while having even more command and control issues built into the activation system. But that would be another game I guess...

Charles Vasey. - Sep 20, 2016 10:06 am (#78318 Total: 91497)  

 
[Vasey., Charles]
Fantastic details regarding B1704. Thanks for sharing! Any idea who will be publishing this one?


No-one at present, I'm working up a number of these, two were shown at Connections UK 2016 recently (L1632). I do wonder how popular they would be, but the designer is the last person to know that.

Thierry Michel - Sep 20, 2016 10:08 am (#78319 Total: 91497)  

[Michel, Thierry]
England beats the French in 15 minutes or less, the series. When is A1415 due?

Roger Taylor - Sep 20, 2016 10:10 am (#78320 Total: 91497)  

 
[Taylor, Roger]
Worst case, you can sell the games as downloads. I can scrounge the Eurobits.

Jason Pipes - Sep 20, 2016 10:32 am (#78321 Total: 91497)  

[Pipes, Jason]
I'd buy one right now if I could.

Vince Hughes - Sep 20, 2016 10:34 am (#78322 Total: 91497)  

 
[Hughes, Vince]
I'd buy one right now if I could

Have you played W1815

Mark Pitcavage - Sep 20, 2016 10:34 am (#78323 Total: 91497)  

 
[Pitcavage, Mark]
One problem with designing an interesting game on the Nuigini (or New Guinea)campaign is that the topography has extremely limiting effects on maneuver possibilities across or along the landmass.


I do not think that is a problem at all. There was plenty of movement. A lot of it was by air (esp. the Australians) and by sea (the Americans). The Japanese had to do a lot of slogging, with the resulting attrition. New Guinea represents a true triphibious campaign.

David Fox - Sep 20, 2016 10:43 am (#78324 Total: 91497)  

 
[Fox, David]
Being neck-deep in Blenheim at present, I will point out that Marlborough did not originally intend the assault on Blenheim to be a diversion. It was meant to be the real thing, but after Cutts was repulsed twice with relative ease, the Duke recognized a nut that would not easily be cracked and transferred his effort to the center.

It did have the decisive effect of spooking Clerembault so badly that he drew most of the French center's infantry reserves into Blenheim, leaving the center vulnerable to the main Allied attack.

Jason Pipes - Sep 20, 2016 11:05 am (#78325 Total: 91497)  

[Pipes, Jason]
Have you played W1815


I have any I really enjoy it.

Roger Leroux - Sep 20, 2016 11:27 am (#78326 Total: 91497)  

 
[Leroux, Roger]
Gamers always claiming they do not want same old subjects but when actually offered Russians versus Afghans or Viking versus Saxons they pass.

This has been my experience over and over again trying to get games I buy to the table.

Tim Allen - Sep 20, 2016 11:46 am (#78327 Total: 91497)  

 
[Allen, Tim]
Can we get Vikings vs Afghans? That would be awesome!

Jason Pipes - Sep 20, 2016 11:48 am (#78328 Total: 91497)  

[Pipes, Jason]
I'm much more inclined to not play a game based on the system (overly Eurogame or too complex for allotted time for example) or because the map and counters are terrible than due to the period or battle. In fact I have been known on many occasions to get into a game and a period I had no interest in prior due exclusively to the quality of the map and counters.

Tim Allen - Sep 20, 2016 11:53 am (#78329 Total: 91497)  

 
[Allen, Tim]
Yes! The triumph of style over substance!


Newer Items Newest Items Outline (newer msg: 13168)


Check Messages   SearchPost Message     Email to Sysop  New User Registration  Login

 [F] CSW Forum  / Boardgaming  / On the Table


Go to:

Who's Here?   [ J. R. Tracy ] [ Mark W Humphries ] [ Per F ] [ James Terry ] [ Joe Donnelly ] [ Gareth Williams ] [ David Rawnsley ] [ Mark Heywood ] [ Rob McCracken ] [ Jerry Smith ] [ James F Sheridan ] [ William Thomas ] [ Dav Vandenbroucke ] [ McKinley Hamby ] [ Tom Burke ] [ Jeff Newell ] [ Stewart Thain ] [ Douglass Bloomer ] [ Mike Stoddart ] [ Gerard Burton ] [ 5 Guests ]

Terms of Use | Forum Guidelines